More About School 2.0
June 29, 2007
Back in April, I first wrote about School 2.0. This summer, I’ve had time to check out what’s trendy on the internet, and the disparity between the web and the classroom could not be greater.The internet has become all about interaction and user control. The surfer wants and expects the power to change/create/say something when he visits a website. As a result, blogs, message boards, and social networking sites tend to do very well.
Sites like Cafepress.com, which enable you to make your own products, do well.
Mygame.com, which just went online in the past couple of days, allows you to create and play your own online games, either using a template or by submitting your own brand-new creation. It, too, will be popular.
Twitter.com is the ultimate in microblogging (basically online text messaging) for a generation that wants to live life in the public arena. It’s already the 285th most visited website in the U.S. and improving each day.
Lulu.com is another site that epitomizes Web 2.0. It allows anyone to publish their own books, CDs, DVDs, and more. You can turn your writing into a published book for somewhere between about $5 and $20, and you can purchase any number of copies that you want. Only want 5 copies? Not a problem. You’re still a published author.
As a result of all this, your students are going to come to you in the fall expecting to be able to interact with and take control of their own learning, since they will have had such control throughout the summer. They’ll expect to be able to set their own pace, decide what they’re interested in learning, and produce an authentic finished product to demonstrate their knowledge.
(On a side note, remember the big self-esteem push of the late 90s and early 00s? Well, it worked. Today’s youth feel completely qualified to be authors, musicians, and web designers. Their new motto seems to be: “Experts? What are those? I can do it better myself.”)
The million-dollar question is this: What are you going to do about it? Will the students feel like they’ve entered a time warp (back a generation or two) when they step into your classroom, or will you do something to make their learning more like the rest of their lives? If you’re going to teach in “Web 2.0″ fashion, how are you going to make that happen? Or is School 2.0 not something you find desirable at all?
Next week, I’ll offer my answers to these questions; in the meantime, please add your thoughts to the comments section of this entry. If they’re interesting, I’ll include your comments/suggestions in my next post.
Entry Filed under: Differentiation, Education, Elementary Education, High Schools, Internet, Learning, School 2.0, Secondary Education, Students, Teaching, school, technology. .
8 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
alicemercer | June 29, 2007 at 11:10 am
Thanks. Your scripted post got me thinking, so I expect to be commenting on your School 2.0 post as well. I think it’s critical that we bring meaningful learning to our students, whatever their backgrounds, otherwise we’re just preparing them to flip burgers at Mickey D’s, or be line managers there (which may be worse).
2.
yunjin | June 30, 2007 at 10:34 am
Fromm said you must “be” the knowledge rather than to “have” the knowledge. Help them focus on the process, not the results.
3.
Tim G | July 6, 2007 at 9:12 am
I appreciate your post and agree with it…in principle. What I’d like to do is agree with it in practice! I’d really like to incorporate a blog into my teaching effort this year (third grade) but haven’t seen many examples of how they’re used. I’ve seen a few blogs with “respond to this question” kind of stuff, but nothing that couldn’t be done in the classroom.
Can you point me toward any great examples of elementary classrooms that are using blogs (student usage) or other Web 2.0 resources? Thanks!
4.
School 2.0 thoughts « Yet There is Method | July 6, 2007 at 2:42 pm
[...] 2.0, Food for thought — tgels @ 7:58 am Mark Pullen of The Elementary Educator has some good thoughts concerning the idea of School 2.0. In principle I think it’s a great idea; I’m curious [...]
5.
cityteacher | July 7, 2007 at 2:32 pm
Yes, I would love to see specific examples. This is hard though because School2.0 is being trailblazed as we type. This is all new territory. I too want to incorporate more student control in the classroom, more process teaching, more product creation rather than “learn this content”. It is something to think about and think hard. btw, glad you mentioned Lulu.com.
6.
tgels | July 7, 2007 at 7:29 pm
I’m sure most readers are familiar with this site, but since I just found it I’ll contribute a bit to answering my own question. Classroom 2.0 is devoted to “devoted to those interested in the practical application of computer technology.” That sounds good. It’s URL is http://classroom20.ning.com/ (I don’t know how to post a link in a comment–sorry).
As coincidence would have it, an “Examples of Elementary Blogs” forum was just started on the site–it’s probably worth keeping an eye on.
Its URL is http://classroom20.ning.com/forum/ topic/show?id=649749%3ATopic%3A32329 (I had to break that URL–hopefully this comment can be edited to provide a link!)
7.
tgels | July 7, 2007 at 7:30 pm
OK, today I learned that WordPress creates links automatically! That second link is still broken, though.
8.
professional_mom_3kidz | July 9, 2007 at 8:33 am
Perhaps less parents would homeschool their children, if public schools were able to create an environment where students have some control of what is happening in their educational lives. (I homeschool, but believe in teachers like Mr. Pullen, of which there are fewer and fewer all the time.)
This could go to an unhealthy extreme also though. I’ve seen it in “unschoolers.” There is a 12-year-old girl we know who is fluent in Japanese. However, she doesn’t know her times tables. Her parents are fine with this, because it is strictly a student-led education.
Perhaps each student could pick a subject (from an array that the teacher provides) that is interesting to them, and they could learn about it in depth for one hour a day. After a month, perhaps they could be allowed to switch. Maybe they want to write a book. They will need to research editors, what a slush pile is, and they will learn just how important grammar and punctuation are.
I think this is possible, for 3rd graders are capable of reading, and when you can read you can learn. If it is something they are passionate about, they may learn it better than anyone else. (For something such as this, I don’t test my 3rd grader…as long as I see he is truly involved in his project. Right now, he is running a mock business on paper.)
As far as “experts” are concerned, once they start learning in depth about a subject, they will find that they really know nothing about it. I thought I knew a lot about Columbus. However, upon doing the research required to teach it to my kids, I found out he was an interesting character AFTER the four trips he made to “America”. Like his stint in jail. lol