The Definitive Guide To School 2.0

July 9, 2007

Here it is: the way I believe we should teach students in a web 2.0 world. 

(I posted about this topic back in April and again in June.  Read those posts if you haven’t already done so to set the scene for this one.)

Our kids are living in a world that is very different than the world we adults grew up in.  As a result, today’s kids are fundamentally different people and learners than we are.  This was first explored in an outstanding essay entitled ”Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants” by Marc Prensky.  A PDF file of that essay can be found here.  Please read it.

In the past few years, “Web 2.0″ has been a popular term to categorize the interactive elements that have become so popular on the web.  Kids don’t expect web pages to be brochures that they can simply read; they expect to be able to use the sites they visit to post comments, edit the actual site’s content, search for things, create things, and otherwise interact with the site. In 2001, in the aforementioned article, Mr. Prensky defined a fundamental shift in the way kids think: their thinking was faster, involved more random order, involved parallel processing and multi-tasking, and was extremely visual-based and kinesthetic-based (and not auditory). By 2007, all of this remains true (even more so today than six years ago), but there’s an additional component to add to all of this: Kids EXPECT to be able to interact with and at least partially control their own learning.  Kids demand that the content they are learning must be relevant NOW.  Kids expect their work to be meaningful and intended for a real purpose and audience.

Busywork was never OK, but today’s kids are literally unable to put up with it.  Their minds NEED to go faster, to do relevant work, and to have some control over what is being asked of them.  What many teachers interpret as misbehavior or impulsivity (or ADHD) is a real physical change in the human brain.

We cannot expect our students to change.  We must change.  Here’s how to make your classroom compatible with the Web 2.0 generation.  (Important sidenote: Notice that most of these are about how we teach and don’t require technology at all.  Many people get too hung up on finding the newest educational website, when what they need is a new teaching style.)

1.  Go faster.  Most teachers talk too much, repeat themselves a great deal, and go over things far too slowly.  Do you feel like you have to say things two or three times because your students don’t listen well?  Start saying everything once and they’ll listen better.

Notice that “go faster” doesn’t mean “go to harder material right away.”

2.  Make the subject matter meaningful to the students.  You MUST show them why the topic matters.  If it doesn’t matter, quit teaching it, no matter what the standards say.

3.  Design (virtually) every assignment around a real purpose and a specific audience. (More on this topic can be found in this post.)  If you need to occasionally do something “fake” like practice cursive letter formations, remind the students of how that skill will be meaningfully utilized in future “real” projects.

4.  Differentiate as much as you possibly can.  You can differentiate the content that you are teaching, the process by which you are teaching it, and/or the product that the students will create to demonstrate their mastery of that topic.  This will allow you to adjust for students’ ability levels and learning styles, and it will also give you a way to give students the kinds of meaningful choices they need to feel like they control their learning.

5.  Utilize Web 2.0 technology.  Ideas of this include the following:

*Start a classroom store at www.cafepress.com to allow your students to turn their art projects into real items, then use the proceeds to purchase items for your classroom or to donate to a charity that your students have researched. 

*Publish student writing at www.lulu.com.  Submit your students’ best writing to other online and offline publishers like The Write Source or Stone Soup magazine.

*Use a classroom blog.  Give your students permission to create posts and comment on others’ posts.  Use pseudonymns or keep the blog private if security issues are a concern.  (My favorite Web 2.0 story about this: My students were blogging about their favorite books.  One girl wrote a gushing review of a not-very-well-known book.  The next day the author herself commented, thanking my student for her kind post.)

*Use online games as a free and easy differentiation tool.  There is NO reason to have all of your students playing the same difficulty level of the same online math game — if ever there was a time where differentiation was simple, this is it.

*Use the vast amount of materials offered on sites like edhelper.com to create tiered assignments and other differentiation options for your students.

*Advanced: Create BRIEF podcasts about key topics from your class.  Put these online so your students can access them at any time as a remediation tool or an enrichment opportunity.  This will help you to adjust the pacing of your teaching for various student needs — you can be working with a group of students while an advanced group who already understands that topic listens to a podcast of something they don’t already understand.

Disclaimer: Many people try implementing one of the tech ideas from #5 above, such as blogging, without adapting their instruction in any other way.  That is worthless.  Asking your students to blog toward a meaningless prompt is pointless — don’t let the inclusion of Web 2.0 technology fool you into thinking you’re being innovative.  You’re not.

Entry Filed under: Differentiation, Education, Elementary Education, Fifth Grade, First Grade, Fourth Grade, Gifted and Talented, High Schools, Learning, School 2.0, Second Grade, Secondary Education, Students, Teaching, Third Grade, school. .

14 Comments Add your own

  • 1. University Update - ADHD &hellip  |  July 9, 2007 at 7:55 pm

    [...] Nile Virus Link to Article adhd The Definitive Guide To School 2.0 » Posted at The Elementary Educator [...]

  • 2. Ben Fulton  |  July 10, 2007 at 4:24 pm

    As an alternative to a classroom blog, a classroom LibraryThing account might be a neat idea. You could create a list of all the books read by the class through the year.

  • 3. Another discussion to kee&hellip  |  July 10, 2007 at 6:14 pm

    [...] — tgels @ 5:14 pm Mark Pullen (The Elementary Educator) has written a post he calls “The Definitive Guide to School 2.0.”  I think it comes pretty close to living up to its title.  His post is based on this [...]

  • 4. tgels  |  July 10, 2007 at 6:28 pm

    You’ve obviously put a lot of thought into this–thank you.

    As I’m reading your material (as well as that of Marc Prensky) I can’t help but feel the twinge of vague anxiety that I’m beginning to feel more and more often: teachers are in the difficult position of being a change agent between a new generation of learners and an older generation of parents, administrators, and legislators.

    While I don’t personally feel the testing pressure that I hear other educators speak of, I have to wonder how the “School 2.o” ideal matches the reality of a “high stakes” educational environment. School 2.o (which, again, I find appealing) seems closely related to the constructivist approach which has its good and bad points depending on the pressures one feels; the constructivist approach, as I see (and read about) it, is more popular at the beginning of the school year than it is as testing approaches in March.

    I have to wonder if School 2.0 will be (can be) a genuine reality before today’s students become the first “digital native” generation of teachers, administrators, and legislators.

  • 5. thirdgradeteacher  |  July 10, 2007 at 6:32 pm

    hey tgels — I just read your post that pinged here… great thoughts. I commented on your post just as you were typing this comment here. I’ll quote that response here, too, for the benefit of anyone else who may read these comments:

    This is a great line, “The constructivist approach, as I see (read about) it, is more popular at the beginning of the school year than it is as testing approaches.”

    To put it more bluntly: we allow students the time to make meaning and secure their understanding of a topic when we can, but then THE TEST comes and we throw our hands up, telling the students, “Don’t worry about understanding. JUST DO THIS FOR THE TEST!!” What a shame.

    Good point, too, about the digital natives creating School 2.0 as they become teachers themselves. One thing to consider: People tend to fall back on the familiar. I fear that the digital natives, when some of them become teachers, will STILL have the temptation to teach the way they were taught, because it’s the only form of instruction they will have seen (if we don’t change things).

    At some point, enough teachers will need to have the boldness to depart from “the way we’ve always done things.” There’s no guarantee that it will be us, or even them, who will get us to “the tipping point” where the way we do school makes a fundamental shift.

  • 6. A. Mercer  |  July 12, 2007 at 3:37 pm

    This is a great guide to technology in the classroom for educators. That disclaimer at the end is the key, it needs to be more than using the technology to teach the same, old, tired curriculum.

    I’ll point this post out next time I’m talking about blogging and technology in the classroom to my peers.

  • 7. Tom Turner  |  July 12, 2007 at 4:34 pm

    Can’t say anything else other than well said.

  • 8. Tracy W  |  July 12, 2007 at 11:03 pm

    What is the evidence that a teacher following your recommendations will have kids who have learnt better?

  • 9. lori  |  July 13, 2007 at 12:02 am

    “Kids EXPECT to be able to interact with and at least partially control their own learning. Kids demand that the content they are learning must be relevant NOW. Kids expect their work to be meaningful and intended for a real purpose and audience.”

    You’ve just rehashed the major tenets of Knowles’ adult learning theory, but the reality is that all learners–even children–have always wanted to learn under these conditions. Why in the world wouldn’t they? Maybe kids didn’t “expect” or “demand” these things in the past, but that doesn’t mean they didn’t want them or shouldn’t have had them all along.

    So when I read numbers 2, 3, and 4 in your list, I don’t see anything new except that the respect given to adult learners may finally be given to young learners, too.

    I like your specific suggestions for how to implement these strategies, but regardless of the tools, teachers really should have been working this way and seeing their students as active, purposeful, engaged learners from the get-go.

  • 10. Carolyn Foote  |  July 13, 2007 at 5:15 pm

    I think your points about students’ expectations for authentic and meaningful and real assignments are right on. Great comments!

  • 11. jwag  |  July 19, 2007 at 4:24 pm

    You wrote: (My favorite Web 2.0 story about this: My students were blogging about their favorite books. One girl wrote a gushing review of a not-very-well-known book. The next day the author herself commented, thanking my student for her kind post.)

    I can’t think of a better justification to an administrator on the value of implementing these kinds of things than what you wrote.

    There are a couple of videos I’ve seen this summer that pertain to the inclusion of web technology into education. I posted them on my blog. The first one “Pay Attention” can be accessed at:

    http://www.soyouwanttoteach.com/2007/07/04/video-pay-attention/

    From there, click on the link to “Did You Know”

  • 12. Teacher 2.0 « The E&hellip  |  January 14, 2008 at 9:04 pm

    [...] Grade, school, technology at 9:04 pm by thirdgradeteacher I’ve written in the past about my Web 2.0 vision for school, which I called “School 2.0.”  An interesting post by Jeff Utecht extends this line of [...]

  • 13. mathercize  |  January 16, 2008 at 10:17 pm

    I agree with the implementation (I’m interacting with content right now, so I’m practicing it). My principal is a wonderful technology pusher, so part of this response is to him as well.

    I believe that this justification of School 2.0 is ill-founded and a bit apocalyptic (paranoia).

    For instance, “What many teachers interpret as misbehavior or impulsivity (or ADHD) is a real physical change in the human brain.” I would want to see some hard evidence that the advent of digital natives has brought an evolution of the human BRAIN (or MIND for that matter).

    The argument for “new ways of engaging content” was a cry of Dewey, granted the mode was different, but the arguments the same. Plato even said “Do not train children to learning by force and harshness, but direct them to it by what amuses their minds, so that you may be better able to discover with accuracy the peculiar bent of the genius of each.” There is nothing new under the sun.

    This type of justification (I’m generalizing now) purports that knowledge is growing exponentially and spinning out of control. I’ve heard it said that we’re preparing students for a world that doesn’t even exist yet (duh)… one that we cannot even imagine. I have no argument here. As a young teacher, when I graduated high school, I had no idea that by the end of my college career the internet would contain massive social networking sites. Yet, is this so earth shattering?

    For brevity, let me say that I just believe that the tools will change (and we should prepare students to use them… or be adaptive thinkers in order to learn the new ones).

    BUT… students will still need to:
    - listen and learn from others… especially those that really know what they’re talking about and not just talking out of their… ignorance (readin’)
    - know how to communicate themselves clearly and effectively (’writn’)
    - and students need to know how to critically analyze patterns and make predictions (’rithmetic)
    Students will still listen to music, will still be perceived as misunderstood, will still assume that they are right most of the time, they will still talk to their friends, …. and they will still need to be taught to see that THE WORLD IS BIGGER then themselves… and that is why I believe that learning that is student-centered falls short.

    School/Web/Classroom 2.0 is another great tool for students to learn about that great big world around them, so long as the focus is the growing of the child by bringing in something from outside.

  • 14. Kids and a “Cogniti&hellip  |  June 3, 2008 at 6:15 pm

    [...] education.  I believe that children are even more inclined to be producers — to subscribe to Web 2.0 mentality — than adults.  As I write this, there is a vast social surplus for children that is left [...]

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


RSS Subscribe to this blog's feed

Recent Comments

tgels on Collecting Feedback
mrsrroom14 on Favorite Elementary Read-Aloud…
mpullen on Collecting Feedback
Mathew on Collecting Feedback
debrennersmith on The Death of Sustained Silent…

Links

Calendar

July 2007
S M T W T F S
« Jun   Sep »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Top Posts